<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pirates sign Nate McLouth to an extension</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.piratesprospects.com/2009/02/pirates-sign-nate-mclouth-to-extension.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.piratesprospects.com/2009/02/pirates-sign-nate-mclouth-to-extension.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:25:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fla Pirate</title>
		<link>http://www.piratesprospects.com/2009/02/pirates-sign-nate-mclouth-to-extension.html#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>Fla Pirate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piratesprospects.com/2009/02/pirates-sign-nate-mclouth-to-an-extension.html#comment-1123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now, the PBC blog is reporting we are interested in Wil Ohman so Grabow might be involved in a trade.&lt;br/&gt; Wasn&#039;t Grabow one of our guys that could possibly be a Type A/B FA type? I understand the one guy will replace the other pretty effectively, but wouldn&#039;t we need a heck of a return to make up for a potential high draft pick for letting Grabow walk?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now, the PBC blog is reporting we are interested in Wil Ohman so Grabow might be involved in a trade.<br /> Wasn&#8217;t Grabow one of our guys that could possibly be a Type A/B FA type? I understand the one guy will replace the other pretty effectively, but wouldn&#8217;t we need a heck of a return to make up for a potential high draft pick for letting Grabow walk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.piratesprospects.com/2009/02/pirates-sign-nate-mclouth-to-extension.html#comment-1122</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piratesprospects.com/2009/02/pirates-sign-nate-mclouth-to-an-extension.html#comment-1122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He&#039;s got two years of arbitration remaining.  However, I&#039;m not 100% that they&#039;ll keep him.  The arbitration costs for closers can be high.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m planning another post looking at the 2010 scene, which will include Capps.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s got two years of arbitration remaining.  However, I&#8217;m not 100% that they&#8217;ll keep him.  The arbitration costs for closers can be high.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m planning another post looking at the 2010 scene, which will include Capps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fla Pirate</title>
		<link>http://www.piratesprospects.com/2009/02/pirates-sign-nate-mclouth-to-extension.html#comment-1121</link>
		<dc:creator>Fla Pirate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.piratesprospects.com/2009/02/pirates-sign-nate-mclouth-to-an-extension.html#comment-1121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I guess this means they might be looking to move Capps this season?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess this means they might be looking to move Capps this season?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
