What is Zach Duke worth?

The deadline for teams and players to exchange arbitration numbers is today, Tuesday January 19th, at noon.  The Pittsburgh Pirates entered the off-season with three players eligible for arbitration.  They signed Ronny Cedeno to a $1,125,000 deal, and non-tendered Matt Capps, which leaves Zach Duke as the only player who has yet to reach an agreement.  If a deal is not reached by noon today, Duke and the Pirates must each submit their figure and start the process of an arbitration hearing.

So what happens next?  If the two sides fail to strike a deal, they submit their figures, and a hearing is scheduled.  At this hearing, each side will present their case for their figure in front of an arbiter.  The arbiter will use this information to determine which salary seems fair: the one submitted by the team, or the one submitted by the player (it has to be one of these two).  This process can be messy, as the team basically has to tear down the player to explain why they feel he’s not worth as much as he thinks he is.  If the team wins, the player not only gets less money, but has the hard feelings from the case the team made.  If the team loses, the hard feelings from the hearing still exist, even though the player was awarded the contract.

This is why teams try to avoid arbitration.  Even if the two sides exchange figures tomorrow, they can still reach a deal, even up to the moment they’re scheduled for their hearing (sometimes deals are reached right outside the hearing room doors).  The question is, what would be an appropriate salary for Zach Duke in 2010?

Duke is in his second year of arbitration, coming off a year in which he made $2.2 M.  A lot of people point to recent performances when determining an arbitration value, although the value of a player is usually based on their whole body of work, and not just the recent season.  So while Duke is coming off a strong season, it doesn’t guarantee that he will see a massive raise in arbitration.  To get a feel for what he could see, let’s compare him to Paul Maholm.

I picked Maholm for a few reasons.  First of all, they both came to the majors around the same time, in the middle of the 2005 season.  They both had immediate success in 2005, struggled for a few years, and recently rebounded.  They’re both left handed, although that doesn’t really factor in to the arbitration debate.  They both would be in their second year of arbitration this year, had it not been for the fact that Maholm signed an extension last year which bought out his arbitration years.  I also picked Maholm because his $4.5 M salary this year is a good guide for Duke.

In the 2010 40-man roster/payroll projection page I estimated Duke at the same $4.5 M that Maholm will make.  Taking a look at the FanGraphs WAR values, Duke has been worth $42.9 M in his career, including $11.2 M in 2009.  Maholm was worth more the last two years, including $14.4 M in 2009, but actually has been worth $41.9 M in his career, which is $1 M less than Duke.  So while Maholm has been better in recent years, they’ve basically been on the same page in their career, with Duke holding the slight edge.

So how do the two players compare stat wise?

Starts - Maholm 127, Duke 130

Innings - Maholm 796.0, Duke 805.1

Won/Loss - Maholm 38-44, Duke 37-55

ERA - Maholm 4.33, Duke 4.30

WHIP - Maholm 1.42, Duke 1.45

FIP - Maholm 4.30, Duke 4.21

K/9 - Maholm 5.72, Duke 4.57

BB/9 - Maholm 3.05, Duke 2.37

HR/9 - Maholm 0.88, Duke 0.85

H/9 - Maholm 9.71, Duke 10.68

Overall the two players are very similar across the board.  They both average a little over six innings per start.  They both have an ERA of around 4.30, and a FIP (Fielder Independent Pitching) in the same range.  They have similar WHIPs, with Duke allowing more hits and fewer walks.  Duke has more losses, although I don’t place much value on a won/loss record.  I just included it here for comparison purposes.

If Duke comes tomorrow with a $4.5 M arbitration figure, it would make total sense.  It’s the same thing the Pirates agreed to pay Paul Maholm this year for his second year of arbitration, and to date, Duke and Maholm are the same player value-wise.

I also wouldn’t be surprised if the Pirates focus more on the recent success of the two players.  For example, if you take what Maholm was worth last year ($14.4 M), and divide it by his $4.5 M salary this year, you see he’s receiving 31.25% of his total worth.  Therefore, applying the same percentage to Duke’s $11.2 M worth in 2009, you would get a $3.5 M salary for Duke.  That could potentially put the two sides about a million apart.

So what is fair?  Do we consider Duke’s recent success in relation to Maholm, or do we blindly look at the whole body of work between the two players?  The whole body of work gives a lot of credit to Duke’s 2006 season, in which he posted a 4.47 ERA in 215.1 innings.  It also gives him credit for eight extra starts over Maholm in 2005, which allowed him to earn an extra $5 M in value.  Are those numbers relevant to his 2010 value?

Personally I think it should be a hybrid of the two.  I think that it should be considered the two are basically on the same career path.  They started out strong, had a decent second year, struggled a bit, then started to come in to their own.  Duke was the better pitcher starting out, but Maholm has been better lately.  I think the recent trend is the one to go with.  As far as a fair value for Duke, I think the $3.5 M is a bit too low, but the $4.5 M that Maholm is getting is too high.  Something in the $4 to $4.25 M range would be acceptable in my opinion.

We’ll find out how close these numbers are today at noon, assuming the Pirates and Duke don’t reach an agreement before that deadline.

Enjoy this story? Pirates Prospects will be switching to a subscription site on 4/13, so that we can continue bringing you the best Pirates coverage there is. For a very small monthly price, you can continue getting articles like this, along with coverage from every minor league city. Get more information here, and subscribe today!

Share This Article

Tim Williams

Tim is the owner and editor in chief of Pirates Prospects. He started the site in January 2009, and turned it into his full time job during the 2011 season. Prior to starting Pirates Prospects, Tim worked with, providing MLB, NHL, and NFL coverage to various national media outlets, including ESPN Insider, USA Today, Yahoo Sports, and the Wall Street Journal. He also writes the annual Prospect Guide, which is sold through the site. Tim lives in Bradenton, where he provides live coverage all year of Spring Training, mini camp, instructs, the Bradenton Marauders, and the GCL Pirates.

Machi Continues To Roll With Save #5

Next Story »

Pirates claim Brandon Jones off of waivers

Latest Analysis

  • Keller Supak Hinsz

    Even With the New Draft Rules, the Pirates Are Still Loading Up on Projectable Pitchers

    3 hours ago

    From 2008-2011, the Pittsburgh Pirates spent a lot of resources on projectable pitchers out of high school. So far, this approach has led to breakout performances from ...

    Read More
  • Josh Bell made the move to first base over the off-season. (Photo credit: David Hague)

    Why Should You Care About Prospects?

    1 day ago

    Yesterday I had a shorter day than usual. The Pirates had cuts at the MLB level, and a road game. The day was shortened at Pirate City, ...

    Read More
  • Gregory Polanco

    Q&A: Trading Prospects For Rentals, Polanco Concerns, Meadows vs Appel

    2 days ago

    I missed the Q&A last week due to a common problem in Spring Training: I forgot what day it was. It was around 6:00 that I was ...

    Read More
  • Nick Kingham f

    Improving His Two-Seam Fastball will Make Nick Kingham a More Effective Pitcher

    4 days ago

    With Jameson Taillon returning from Tommy John surgery, and unlikely to make an impact at the Major League level early in the year, the top prospect to ...

    Read More
  • Arquimedes Caminero 3

    The Roster Situations That Could Impact the Makeup of the Pirates Bullpen

    6 days ago

    There are less than two weeks remaining in Spring Training, and the one area where the Pittsburgh Pirates had actual position battles is heating up. There were ...

    Read More
  • Jordan Luplow

    How the Pirates are Trying to Stay Ahead of the Curve With the New Draft Rules

    6 days ago

    The 2011 Collective Bargaining Agreement brought a lot of changes to Major League Baseball. The biggest change for the Pittsburgh Pirates came in the draft. From 2008-2011, ...

    Read More
  • Alen Hanson

    The Key For Alen Hanson to Help the Pirates in the Majors This Year

    1 week ago

    When the Pittsburgh Pirates moved Alen Hanson to second base last year, part of the plan was to get him to the majors faster by putting him at ...

    Read More
  • Tyler Glasnow 2

    What the Stats Don’t Tell You About Tyler Glasnow

    1 week ago

    The stat line for Tyler Glasnow’s start at Pirate City yesterday looked great: 3 IP, 0 H, 1 R, 1 ER, 1 BB, 1 K. The lone run ...

    Read More
  • JaCoby Jones Josh Bell

    JaCoby Jones Did Fine in the Move to Shortstop, But Needs to Cut Down on Strikeouts

    2 weeks ago

    The Pittsburgh Pirates drafted JaCoby Jones as an outfielder in the third round of the 2013 draft, then surprised everyone the following year when they moved him ...

    Read More
  • Cody Dickson is a lefty with the upside of a middle of the rotation starter. (Photo Credit: Mark Olson)

    The Mental Adjustment that Led to Cody Dickson’s Dominant 2014 Second Half

    2 weeks ago

    Trusting his stuff and not trying to do too much — that has been the key for left-handed pitcher Cody Dickson so far in his professional baseball ...

    Read More
  • Browse More Articles