Comments on: 2010 Pittsburgh Pirates Rule 5 Eligible Players http://www.piratesprospects.com/2010/09/2010-pittsburgh-pirates-rule-5-eligible-players.html Wed, 22 May 2013 21:11:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Nate http://www.piratesprospects.com/2010/09/2010-pittsburgh-pirates-rule-5-eligible-players.html#comment-16220 Nate Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:49:00 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=4232#comment-16220 Pretty bad when I’d rather they run Jo-Jo out there than former 1st rounder Lincoln. Put in the pen where is comfortable/successful.

]]> By: Matt Beam http://www.piratesprospects.com/2010/09/2010-pittsburgh-pirates-rule-5-eligible-players.html#comment-16212 Matt Beam Sun, 17 Jun 2012 18:43:00 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=4232#comment-16212 Growing pains? The worst that either could do is exactly what we’ve seen from Lincoln for the past 3 starts now…Owens should be starting Sat. at home vs the Tigers. I would have preferred to see him get his feet wet today vs. a far less imposing lineup in CLE, but oh well

]]> By: Matt Beam http://www.piratesprospects.com/2010/09/2010-pittsburgh-pirates-rule-5-eligible-players.html#comment-16211 Matt Beam Sun, 17 Jun 2012 18:32:00 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=4232#comment-16211 4 ER’s through 3.1 IP today, can we please officially end the Brad Lincoln as a SP experiment? He is far to hittable when pitching more than 1-2 innings. Why not given Rudy Owens a shot at starting and put Lincoln back in the bullpen where he seems to thrive?

]]> By: Lee Young http://www.piratesprospects.com/2010/09/2010-pittsburgh-pirates-rule-5-eligible-players.html#comment-16205 Lee Young Sun, 17 Jun 2012 13:07:00 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=4232#comment-16205 Hmmmmmmm….you make a good point. However, depends on what we’d have to give up to get Saunders.

Wouldn’t mind seeing Owens or Locke, but maybe the brass doesn’t want to risk their growing pains?

Bedard certainly hasn’t been sharp since his back injury.

]]>