Comments on: Is the 2007 Draft Better Than We Thought? http://www.piratesprospects.com/2011/06/is-the-2007-draft-better-than-we-thought.html Tue, 21 May 2013 19:51:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Anonymous http://www.piratesprospects.com/2011/06/is-the-2007-draft-better-than-we-thought.html#comment-7639 Anonymous Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:37:00 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=12685#comment-7639 Thank you Kevin. What you said was the point, it wasn’t great but it’s also turning out to be better than most people thought, myself included. That’s why I wrote about it, basically it’s a pleasant surprise to see something from what looked like nothing.

  Also there is a quiz at the end of all the history columns, sometime around 2015 so I hope you’re paying attention.

]]> By: Anonymous http://www.piratesprospects.com/2011/06/is-the-2007-draft-better-than-we-thought.html#comment-7636 Anonymous Wed, 29 Jun 2011 19:10:00 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=12685#comment-7636 It’s been a recreational sport of many to pan this draft.  It was really Moskos v. Weiters for most.

Out of every draft the goal is to get 1 starter and 1-2 bench/bullpen guys.  Although this draft is not sexy, if Watson/McPherson/Moskos contribute it won’t be the epic disaster that many think it is.

Nice article, John.  Good to see you in the 21st century this article!

]]> By: jonathan http://www.piratesprospects.com/2011/06/is-the-2007-draft-better-than-we-thought.html#comment-7632 jonathan Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:02:00 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=12685#comment-7632 still not very good… 2 bullpen arms and a plan C or D backup infielder is practically nothing

]]> By: jonathan http://www.piratesprospects.com/2011/06/is-the-2007-draft-better-than-we-thought.html#comment-7633 jonathan Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:02:00 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=12685#comment-7633 still not very good… 2 bullpen arms and a plan C or D backup infielder is practically nothing

]]>