Comments on: Pirates Have Six in John Sickels’ Top 120

By: PiratesFan

PiratesFan — Tue, 03 Jul 2012 03:58:00 +0000

Ranked 77. Last paragraph.

By: PiratesFan

PiratesFan — Tue, 03 Jul 2012 03:58:00 +0000

What explains Marte’s drop?

By: James Vargo

James Vargo — Tue, 03 Jul 2012 01:24:00 +0000

No Hanson?

By: Justin Gray

Justin Gray — Tue, 03 Jul 2012 00:35:00 +0000

they would possibly have 8 of the top 120 prospects in the game if they included this year’s draft class and Appel signs… average team has 4 of the top 120

By: blackmax

blackmax — Mon, 02 Jul 2012 21:56:00 +0000

Sickels also complained that Bell is “supposed to be polished” but isn’t. A few healthy at bats would change his mind, I’d guess.

By: Ian Rothermund

Ian Rothermund — Mon, 02 Jul 2012 21:13:00 +0000

Maybe 3…..as a 19 yr old out of h.s. in his first pro season. Also, if you split the time he was playing in half, he did better in the second half than he did in the first. Either way…talk about small sample size. God forbid Taillon ever misses a start with a migraine or anything, he might fall off the list altogether.

By: jclorley

jclorley — Mon, 02 Jul 2012 20:10:00 +0000

Would actually be 7 except Sickels admitted in the Q&A afterward that he thought Gregory Polanco was 22 instead of 20. He said that if he continues he’ll surely be on the list in August.

By: Lee Young

Lee Young — Mon, 02 Jul 2012 19:01:00 +0000

how long did he play…..two whole weeks?

By: blackmax

blackmax — Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:55:00 +0000

In his follow up comments about Bell, Sickels says that he dropped in part because his pre-injury performance “wasn’t pretty.”