Comments on: Pirates Interested in Paul Maholm http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/07/pirates-interested-in-paul-maholm.html Your best source for news on the Pittsburgh Pirates and their minor league system. Sat, 20 Sep 2014 07:09:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: 12_Dr http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/07/pirates-interested-in-paul-maholm.html#comment-17951 Mon, 23 Jul 2012 17:46:00 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=36918#comment-17951 what? its not about money or waiting. its about being smart with your roster and not overpaying. We took maholms would be cash and gave it to Burnett. AND we have cash to burn at trade deadline.

]]>
By: John Lease http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/07/pirates-interested-in-paul-maholm.html#comment-17879 Sat, 21 Jul 2012 13:42:00 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=36918#comment-17879 Winning is worth more than anything. We’ve waited long enough.

]]>
By: VRR Cards http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/07/pirates-interested-in-paul-maholm.html#comment-17857 Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:31:00 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=36918#comment-17857 Maholm is no better than any of the Indy lefties and might not be as good. So why bother?

]]>
By: Kevin_Creagh http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/07/pirates-interested-in-paul-maholm.html#comment-17855 Fri, 20 Jul 2012 17:11:00 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=36918#comment-17855 The cash required to keep Maholm ($9.75M) was more than he was worth, especially as determined by what he ended up signing for.

]]>
By: salempirate http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/07/pirates-interested-in-paul-maholm.html#comment-17850 Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:40:00 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=36918#comment-17850 LOL….the more things change, the more they stay the same.
Pirates haven’t been linked to Liriano….yet.

]]>
By: John Lease http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/07/pirates-interested-in-paul-maholm.html#comment-17847 Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:35:00 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=36918#comment-17847 Gee, the Pirates could have kept him originally, for nothing more than cold hard cash. Bring him back, can’t have enough pitching.

]]>
By: Thom Kay http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/07/pirates-interested-in-paul-maholm.html#comment-17844 Fri, 20 Jul 2012 15:01:00 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=36918#comment-17844 I don’t want to see Bedard replaced. He’ll get it back. He’s a good pitcher.

Though I’d be fine with having Maholm again. Maholm would not be worth the $9M+ it would have cost to keep him, but he’s a mid to bottom of the rotation guy. He’s basically the same pitcher as Jason Vargas. Not a big upgrade, but I trust him to be solid.

]]>
By: Lee Young http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/07/pirates-interested-in-paul-maholm.html#comment-17840 Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:14:00 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=36918#comment-17840 ROFL

]]>
By: buccotime57 http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/07/pirates-interested-in-paul-maholm.html#comment-17838 Fri, 20 Jul 2012 14:12:00 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=36918#comment-17838

]]>
By: Lee Young http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/07/pirates-interested-in-paul-maholm.html#comment-17831 Fri, 20 Jul 2012 13:36:00 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=36918#comment-17831 Please, God, NO!!

]]>