By Kevin Creagh and Steve DiMiceli
What does a team with a high WAR for hitters look like? Why does it seem like the Pirates can just never measure up with the rest of the National League in terms of WAR for batters?
Steve DiMiceli and I sifted through the WAR data from 2008 to 2012 (using Fangraphs’ WAR) for all the NL Teams. The five years of data makes for a good representative sample and also dovetails with the full tenure of Neal Huntington as GM. We used the 8 guys shown on Baseball Reference as the nominal starters at their position to determine each team’s starting 8 hitters. Once all the data was collected, we tiered the WAR’s into the following 5 categories:
Elite — greater than or equal to 5 WAR
Strong — between 3.5 and 4.9 WAR
Good — between 2.0 and 3.4 WAR
Sub-Par — between 0.5 and 1.9 WAR
Detrimental — less than or equal to 0.4 WAR
Keeping in mind that WAR encompasses both batting and fielding contributions, the chart below shows the top 3 and bottom 3 teams for each year in terms of hitters’ WAR. Also within the chart is the team’s record that year and the breakdown of how many of each type of hitter they had for that year.
|Year||Team||Total WAR||Record||# Elite||# Strong||# Good||# Sub-Par||# Detrimental|
We included Pittsburgh’s team WAR for each year during the 2 occasions that they were not already in the bottom 3 of the league. Some interesting conclusions can be extrapolated from this year, both obvious and more sublime. The first is that good hitting teams win. Not exactly a stop-the-press moment, but of the 15 teams in the Top 3 all had at least 83 wins. However, the corollary of that is not always true — not all of the bottom 3 teams were comprised of losing teams. Three of the 16 bottom teams (there was a tie in 2009) had winning records, indicating that their pitching staffs must have been fantastic that year.
The top hitting teams all had multiple players combined in the Elite and Strong categories. In fact, only 1 team out of the 15 top WAR teams had less than 3 combined players in these categories (St. Louis in 2009 — thanks Albert!). As you can see in the chart above, Pittsburgh has not had more than 1 player between these two categories in the past 5 years. Had Walker not been dealing with finger and back issues for the last 1/3 of the season, he surely would have raised his 3.3 WAR up to the Strong category of 3.5, but he didn’t. The Pirates don’t necessarily need to be a top 3 hitting WAR team to be successful, but this chart shows how short they have been falling to those types of teams in the past 5 years. At a minimum, McCutchen will need two teammates (most likely Walker and Alvarez) to step up into the Elite and/or Strong categories for the Pirates to have a legitimate lineup of quality players.
The other issue at hand is that the top 3 teams each year also minimized their Sub-Par and Detrimental players. Only 1 of the 15 teams had 4 players in these combined categories. An additional 4 teams had 3 players either Sub-Par and/or Detrimental, leaving the other 10 teams to have either 2 or fewer players in these categories. For comparison, the Pirates have had at least 5 players each year since 2008, with 2011’s team having 6 combined players in the Sub-Par and/or Detrimental category. With only 8 starters, you can start to see why the Pirates have had so many woes with batters. However, it is also worth noting that every team had at least 1 player that could be classified as at least Sub-Par.
The two weakest offensive positions this year for the Pirates were at catcher and shortstop. Barmes did contribute 1.7 WAR to the Pirates in 2012, but that was nearly all the result of his defensive work. Over the past 5 years, there have been 39 (out of 80) player-seasons where the shortstop contributed 2.0 WAR or better to his team, making him at least a Good-level player. The Pirates have not had any of those seasons over the past 5 years. At the catcher position there have been 40 player-seasons, or 50% occurrence, in the past 5 years where the catcher has contributed at least 2.0 WAR. The Pirates did have 1 of these seasons with Ryan Doumit in 2008. It would be more difficult to upgrade these spots, as there has been only a 50% rate of achieving Good-level, than it would be to upgrade a corner OF bat (54% occurrence of 2.0 WAR).
Whether the improvement will come from internal upgrades (Walker and Alvarez top this list), full time status for players like Marte (1.2 WAR in just over a quarter-season), or free agents, the Pirates will need to get 2-3 additional players into the Elite or Strong categories to have a well-balanced hitter WAR in 2013. If not, more sub-standard performance from highly-valued offensive positions may follow.Pirates Prospects is FREE today in honor of the Wild Card game. You get special access to all of our content, which is typically reserved only for subscribers. We cover the Pirates 365 days a year, with live coverage all throughout the playoffs, and off-season coverage of the minor league players in the Arizona Fall League and Winter Leagues. During the season we average well over 6 articles per day on the Pirates. This is the best stop if you're a hardcore Pirates fan, and the subscription prices are very low.
Our lowest rates are $2.22 per month under our Top Prospect Plan, which also gets you a FREE copy of the 2016 Prospect Guide -- a book that features profiles on every prospect in the system. We also have a promotion with DraftKings where you can get a FREE one-year subscription to the site by signing up as a new DraftKings customer and making a $5 minimum deposit. Subscribe today for our full playoff coverage, and all of our daily coverage of the Pirates' system.