http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/11/john-sickels-releases-his-top-20-pirates-prospects-for-2013.html Sun, 19 May 2013 12:03:45 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/11/john-sickels-releases-his-top-20-pirates-prospects-for-2013.html#comment-22279 wkkortas Mon, 26 Nov 2012 21:12:31 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=44350#comment-22279 I can understand the low ranking–Sickels’ concern is Dickerson’s power, and if he doesn’t develop power he’s not going to be able to play first every day in the majors. The guy I thought was ranked a bit low, at least in terms of a letter grade, was Heredia; I think he’s a little too concerned about his secondary ptiches at this stage of the game.

]]> http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/11/john-sickels-releases-his-top-20-pirates-prospects-for-2013.html#comment-22278 Lee Young Mon, 26 Nov 2012 20:23:33 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=44350#comment-22278 Ehhhh…what do Road Bowlers know about prospects?

]]> http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/11/john-sickels-releases-his-top-20-pirates-prospects-for-2013.html#comment-22277 Jeremy Ransom Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:42:40 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=44350#comment-22277 i thought Dickerson was ranked a little low

]]> http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/11/john-sickels-releases-his-top-20-pirates-prospects-for-2013.html#comment-22276 WNCRoadBowling Mon, 26 Nov 2012 17:27:25 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=44350#comment-22276 Barnes being ranked 6th surprised me a little although I was glad to see it was because he rates him highly and not because the system isn’t good.

]]>