Comments on: Pirates Outright Ali Solis to Indianapolis; Morton Activated From DL http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/11/pirates-outright-ali-solis-to-indianapolis-morton-activated-from-dl.html Your best source for news on the Pittsburgh Pirates and their minor league system. Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:32:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: jalcorn http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/11/pirates-outright-ali-solis-to-indianapolis-morton-activated-from-dl.html#comment-21996 Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:51:45 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=43791#comment-21996 I don’t think so, he was playing up through Sept 1st at Indy. He really had an OK season and finished strong over the last two months. Barring a trade, Tony is a better option that the veteran FA’s available.

]]>
By: Ian Rothermund http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/11/pirates-outright-ali-solis-to-indianapolis-morton-activated-from-dl.html#comment-21995 Sun, 04 Nov 2012 18:04:51 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=43791#comment-21995 If anything, I would’ve liked to have seen him work on just hitting. I think that needed more work than his defense, so it wouldn’t have worn him down by the time Spring Training comes around. I’m sure he sees the writing on the wall with the catching situation, and if he’s smart, he’s not wasting his offseason.

]]>
By: whiteAngus http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/11/pirates-outright-ali-solis-to-indianapolis-morton-activated-from-dl.html#comment-21993 Sun, 04 Nov 2012 15:41:16 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=43791#comment-21993 I believe Sanchez was hurt at the end of the season.

]]>
By: Brian Bernard http://www.piratesprospects.com/2012/11/pirates-outright-ali-solis-to-indianapolis-morton-activated-from-dl.html#comment-21992 Sun, 04 Nov 2012 14:38:36 +0000 http://www.piratesprospects.com/?p=43791#comment-21992 Tim,
With the clear uncertainty of the catching situation in Pittsburgh, why isn’t Tony Sanchez playing winter ball somewhere to either prove he’s ready – or improve on what he’s struggled with?
Why do you make of this?

]]>