First Pitch: Are Jeanmar Gomez and Jeff Locke a Product of a Successful System?

Last night I finished my article about Jeanmar Gomez with a thought — should there be a debate between Jeanmar Gomez and Jeff Locke for the final rotation spot when Charlie Morton returns?

On one side you’ve got Locke, who has a 2.45 ERA in 58.2 innings, but has a 4.30 xFIP. Locke is due for a regression mostly due to a low BABIP (.224) and a high strand rate (84.1%). The league averages are usually .290-.300 and 70%.

On the other side you’ve got Gomez, who has a 2.30 ERA in 43 innings, but has a 4.27 xFIP. Gomez is a similar story to Locke. He has a .203 BABIP and an 85% strand rate.

I was thinking about those two today. I was thinking about how we give Locke priority, mostly because he’s been in the system longer and we’ve viewed him as a prospect for so long. Gomez was added in a minor deal this off-season, and didn’t have the prospect tag due to already throwing (and struggling in) over 200 innings in the majors. But Gomez is also a few months younger than Locke, and has a low 90s sinker that can touch 93-94 MPH. So there’s no reason to dismiss Gomez if you’re going to give any kind of credit to Locke. Right now they’re both looking like strong number four starters who are pitching well over their heads.

While debating between Locke and Gomez, I started thinking about a more important question. No, it wasn’t “should Charlie Morton just go to the bullpen for now?” like a lot of you asked on Twitter, in the comments, and via e-mail. I’ll get to Morton in a bit. The more important question is: why are Locke and Gomez out-performing their numbers?

On the surface we know the answer. They have low BABIPs and high strand rates, which will both normalize. But something caught my eye this morning. I looked at the Pirates rotation and noticed that every pitcher had average or better ground ball ratios. The league average this year is 44.5%. The Pirates starters, ranked from highest to lowest:

1. Jeanmar Gomez (57.0%)

2. A.J. Burnett (56.4%)

3. Jeff Locke (49.4%)

4. Francisco Liriano (46.0%)

5. Wandy Rodriguez (44.2%)

I also thought about Vin Mazzaro, who is in a very similar situation to Gomez. Mazzaro had some brief success in the majors, but overall his career has been poor. This year he’s got a 2.25 ERA in 20 innings, but has a 3.78 xFIP, mostly due to an 84.1% strand rate. While looking at Mazzaro, I noticed how many relievers had extreme ground ball rates. Mark Melancon (62.3%), Justin Wilson (56.2%), and even guys who hadn’t pitched much or who were no longer on the team like Chris Leroux (66.7%), Jose Contreras (56.3%), Jared Hughes (56.8%), and Bryan Morris (61%).

This led me to look at the league stats, and what I found wasn’t surprising. The Pirates as a team had allowed the second most ground balls in the league. Their pitching staff has combined for a 50.0% ground ball rate, second only to the 50.7% rate by the St. Louis Cardinals. Third place is a tie between the Rockies and Mets at 47.0%, which is a bit of a drop off.

While looking at the ground balls, I also noticed that everyone has a low BABIP. Once again, going to the rotation:

1. Jeanmar Gomez (.203)

2. Jeff Locke (.224)

3. Wandy Rodriguez (.259)

4. A.J. Burnett (.279)

5. Francisco Liriano (.338)

Well, almost everyone. You could say that Liriano could show improvements, but his numbers are also a small sample size that can be influenced by one start (like his last outing). After seeing the BABIP numbers I looked at the league totals. The Pirates had the second lowest BABIP in the league at .266. The lowest was the Cubs at .265. Tied for third was the White Sox and the Reds at .276, which is a bit of drop off. I feel like I’m repeating myself, only with a different stat.

Every time the “regression” topic for guys like Gomez and Locke is brought up, the idea floats around that maybe those guys are doing something special and they really can pitch with those extremely low BABIP numbers. First of all, no. They absolutely won’t continue with a .200-.225 BABIP. No starter has maintained a BABIP below .223 over a full season in over two decades. It will go up. But how much? A.J. Burnett is right there with them as an extreme ground ball pitcher and he’s got a .279 BABIP. The xFIP numbers assume a drop to .290-.300 for Locke and Gomez. If they only drop to .280, you can expect better results than their xFIP totals, which aren’t bad.

The Pirates have the second best ground ball rate in the league. They have the second lowest BABIP in the league. I didn’t have to think hard for a theory on why these two things were happening. It wasn’t luck. It was the system the Pirates are built on.

There have been two areas the Pirates have prioritized with this team. The first is defense. We saw that when they paid $10.5 M for two years of Clint Barmes. I’ve asked many times over the last two years when they might give someone like Jordy Mercer more playing time, and the answer is always the same: Clint Barmes is our shortstop. We saw the priority on defense when they spent big on Russell Martin. We’ve seen it in the past when they’ve taken guys like Lyle Overbay who have had good historical defensive value. We see it on the bench with the addition of guys like Brandon Inge and John McDonald.

The second area is in having ground ball pitchers. If you’ve followed the transactions over the last six years, you’d already know this trend. If there’s a draft pick, he probably throws on a downward plane, throws a sinker, gets a lot of ground balls with his breaking pitch, or a combination of any of those things. I can’t count how many pitchers have been converted to sinkerball pitchers over the last few years. When it comes to minor league free agents, it’s usually guys with not so inspiring numbers and limited upsides, but high ground ball rates. Kyle Waldrop is the poster child for this. In his brief time in the majors he had a 3.34 K/9 (usually around 4-6 in the minors), but had an extreme 72.2% ground ball ratio (in line with his minor league numbers).

The system is defense, and the best way to play to that system is to get extreme ground ball pitchers. After thinking about this, I consulted James Santelli, wondering if he knew of any articles that measured whether BABIPs can be lowered due to good ground ball rates and good defense. All I had was the FanGraphs glossary, which provided the following:

Batting Average on Balls In Play (BABIP) measures how many balls in play against a pitcher go for hits. While typically around 30% of all balls in play fall for hits, there are three main variables that can affect BABIP rates for individual players:

a) Defense - Say a player cracks a hard line drive down the third base line. If an elite fielder is playing at third, they may make a play on it and throw the runner out. However, if there’s a dud over there with limited range, the ball could just as easily fly by for a hit. Pitchers have no control over the defenses behind them; all they can do is minimally affect if a ball is more likely to be in the air or on the ground.

–BREAK–

Groundball pitchers have a lower BABIP on groundballs than other pitchers. In other words, if a pitcher has an extreme groundball rate, they also tend to be extra good at making sure those grounders are hit weakly and turn into out.

That last part is a key point, and the research done by Matt Swartz shows that ground ball pitchers have more control over their BABIP, and can have a lower number than fly ball pitchers. I think if you combine that with a good defense, which the Pirates have, then you could definitely make an argument that the BABIP ratios should be lower than the .290-.300 range for guys like Gomez and Locke.

Looking at the defensive metric UZR, here is where the Pirates rank in the league at each infield position. We’ll also look at the Cardinals, since they have a good ground ball rate, but not as good of a BABIP.

Position: Pirates/Cardinals
1B: 18th/28th
2B: 13/18
SS: 16/11 (Pirates are ironically being dragged down by defensive specialist John McDonald)
3B: 8/18

The Pirates have been getting strong defense from Clint Barmes (14.3 UZR/150) and Pedro Alvarez (6.8 UZR/150), which has been huge for the pitching staff. The Cardinals are getting a lot of ground balls, but the Pirates have been better defensively at every position, except shortstop. When you compare starter vs starter, Barmes (14.3 UZR/150) comes out ahead of Pete Kozma (10.8 UZR/150).

You don’t really think of systems in baseball that often. On offense it’s one hitter against one pitcher. On defense you can have a strategy, but it’s not like football where every player is involved in every play. That doesn’t necessarily mean you can’t have a strategy. The Pirates definitely seem to have one, prioritizing defense and ground ball pitchers. Based on the studies and comments above, if executed correctly that could lead to better than expected results. You could argue that the Pirates are executing that strategy correctly. And it could be creating a system.

I know you’re not supposed to compare the Steelers and the Pirates, but I’m going to do a comparison. One of the reasons the Steelers have been successful over the last decade (although maybe not as successful the last few years) is because they employ a system. That system allows them to ignore big-name free agents, and add guys like James Farrior, James Harrison, or Larry Foote. While the Washington Redskins are spending big on name players, the Steelers are adding system players. And that’s why they win. They don’t buy the name, they buy the skill that matches their system.

For the Pirates it could be the same thing. They’ve got a system set up with strong infield defense and ground ball-heavy pitchers. And that last part is all you need. A.J. Burnett is a ground ball pitcher, and is considerably more valuable than Jeanmar Gomez. But you only need ground balls for this system, which means Jeanmar Gomez is going to have value. With any other team, I don’t think a guy like Gomez would have more value than a 5th/6th starter. With the Pirates he could put up numbers similar to a number four starter. All you have to do is look at his numbers with Cleveland to see that. They were a below average defensive team the last few years, and each year Gomez’s xFIP was lower than his ERA. You could make the same argument for Vin Mazzaro, or any other ground ball pitcher on the team who doesn’t dominate with strikeouts like Burnett.

Charlie Morton hasn't had the best ERA, but he has a great ground ball rate and strikes out more than Gomez and Locke, which fits well with the Pirates defense.

Charlie Morton hasn’t had the best ERA, but he has a great ground ball rate and strikes out more than Gomez and Locke, which fits well with the Pirates defense.

That’s where we come back to Charlie Morton. In his career, Morton hasn’t had the best ERA. He’s got a 5.06 ERA in his career, but a 4.31 xFIP. He also has a 53% ground ball rate, which has been 56-58% since he converted to being a sinkerball pitcher. People have been pointing to his career ERA as evidence that he shouldn’t be a lock for the rotation. But you could have made the same arguments about Jeanmar Gomez, who had a horrible ERA coming into the year, and the only thing he had going for him was a low 90s sinker that produced a lot of ground balls. Morton has a low-to-mid 90s sinker and a higher strikeout rate.

My feeling is that Gomez and Locke will regress. There’s no way they’re going to maintain their .200-.225 BABIP and 85% strand rates. But I don’t think they’ll regress all the way to a league average BABIP. The studies linked above show that ground ball pitchers and good defense can lower a BABIP. The Pirates have both working for them. With the system they’ve set up, they can put any ground ball pitcher on the mound, and he’s going to most likely out-perform his advanced metrics. That won’t work for everyone. It didn’t work for Jared Hughes or Chris Leroux. But I think that’s the other side of the pendulum swing. Locke and Gomez are getting really lucky numbers, and out-performing their skill.

I think the Pirates have a good system going. Build a good defense and then add ground ball pitchers to play into that defense. I think because of that, guys like Gomez and Mazzaro and any other heavy ground ball pitcher will have success pitching for this team, while playing above their advanced metrics. Guys like Gomez and Locke will regress, but maybe not as far as you’d expect. It’s also for that reason that I’m not concerned with Morton. He learned the sinker in 2010, and it was really effective in 2011. He was hurt last year, to the point where he couldn’t even throw the pitch, or his curveball. When healthy, the sinker is a good pitch and generates plenty of easy ground outs. With this defense, that’s a great thing. Add in the advantage Morton has with the extra strikeouts, and that’s why I automatically place him over Locke and Gomez.

I don’t think you can dismiss what Locke and Gomez have done on an individual level this year. But they owe part of their success to the system. If either pitcher is with a team that has poor infield defense, they’re not seeing the same results, and definitely not playing above their metrics. For that reason, I don’t think the individual players matter. I think the only thing that matters is adding the right players for the system. In this case it’s guys with high ground ball rates and strikeout rates to go along with that. Those guys are going to have success with this defense behind them, and will probably even put up lower BABIP numbers than the league average. So I wouldn’t be hesitant to remove Gomez or Locke from the rotation, despite the strong numbers. I think the same thing that is helping them exceed their advanced metrics will also help Charlie Morton, and even more with Morton because of his added strikeouts.

Links and Notes

**The DraftStreet freeroll is back! One Day FREE Fantasy Contest – $300 in cash prizes. Join today!

**The newest Pirates Prospects Podcast is up and available for download or streaming. P3 Episode 5: Polanco the Top Prospect? Can Pirates Keep Winning? Mark Melancon Interview.

**The podcast will have some changes starting this week. Each week the podcast has been about 70 minutes, and has included minor league and major league talk. Starting this week we’ll be running two smaller shows per week. We will still have an episode each Friday, talking about the major league team. This show will consist of the segment with myself, Tom Bragg, and James Santelli. We will also have a second episode each week talking about the minor leagues. That will include input from our minor league writers, as well as draft and international signing discussions. Each episode will be about 30 minutes on average. So it will be the same content each week, just broken up throughout the week to make things easier for everyone. You don’t have to carve a little over an hour of time out of your day. I don’t have to spend an entire day editing one long podcast (instead editing over part of several days, which I think will be better). Right now I’m thinking the second show will go up on Mondays.

**Prospect Notebook: Where Will Heredia Go? Sandfort Seeing Changeup Improvements.

**Five Candidates For a Promotion and When They Could Be Promoted.

**Pirates Notebook: Hurdle Not Too Worried About Reliever Innings.

**Pirates Use Four-Run Inning To Knock Out Sanchez, Win 5-3.

**Prospect Watch: Taillon Struggles With Control, Bell and Lambo Homer.

**Minor League Schedule: Kingham Faces First Place Ft Myers, Pimentel Gets Morning Start.

Tim Williams

Author: Tim Williams

Tim is the owner and editor in chief of Pirates Prospects. He started the site in January 2009, and turned it into his full time job during the 2011 season. Prior to starting Pirates Prospects, Tim worked with AccuScore.com, providing MLB, NHL, and NFL coverage to various national media outlets, including ESPN Insider, USA Today, Yahoo Sports, and the Wall Street Journal. He also writes the annual Prospect Guide, which is sold through the site. Tim lives in Bradenton, where he provides live coverage all year of Spring Training, mini camp, instructs, the Bradenton Marauders, and the GCL Pirates.

Share This Post On
  • emjayinTN

    Tim: Good stuff, but as I have stated before, Gerrit Cole will be staying at the Marriott across the street from PNC before the Giants come to town, and he will throw the first game against them at PNC. Ignore Locke and Gomez- Morton was not a ball of fire in the majors until he quit trying to throw 4 seam fastballs at 95 past hitters and went to the two seamer that induced ground balls. He was 10-10 that good year with a poor W/K ratio, and the change of throwing angle could have contributed to the arm surgery – IMO, he needs to prove he can be productive in the middle of the Rotation. Right now, I do not see it and think he needs at least 3 or 4 more rehab starts.

    • http://www.facebook.com/lee.young.161 Lee Young

      Cole will probably not be up until Sept. jmho

    • leadoff

      I agree with more rehab starts for Morton, the Pirates don’t need him right now, if they needed him things would be different.

      • joe g.

        From the Hurdle quote about Charlie and commanding his sinker, curve, etc. I ‘m betting that he needs to really impress in his next rehab start to be considered for a spot in the rotation.

    • http://twitter.com/mrosati56 mrosati56

      I think you might be missing a couple of points regarding Morton. First, it’s well established that W/L record for a pitcher is a completely meaningless stat, it reflects nothing of a pitchers performance. You are correct about the K rates, but that being said, his K rate is still better than Locke or Gomez, and it comes along with the same great GB ratios, which means even less regression. You’re right, Cole might be called up (though he’s obviously not ready), but that still leaves either Locke or Gomez in the rotation. I for one would like to see Morton go to the rotation, Gomez to the bullpen. If Morton struggles, then you move Gomez back to the rotation.

  • https://profiles.google.com/115522615427589477970 Mike C.

    One of the best articles I’ve read all year.
    excellent analysys.
    I was always curious of extreme groundball/sinker ball pitchers with correlation to DIPS and BABIP.
    xFIP is a good indicator of a pitcher’s real skill level, but there are rare instances where it doesn’t tell the whole story and the Pirates situation seems to be one of them.

    Curious to when do you think the Pirates started implementing this “system” and how it started?

    also had to add how ‘m pleasantly surprised everyday with Pedro’s improved defense.

  • http://www.facebook.com/lee.young.161 Lee Young

    Tim…question…you say “The Cardinals are getting a lot of ground balls, but the Pirates have been better defensively at every position, except shortstop. When you compare starter vs starter, Barmes (14.3 UZR/150) comes out ahead of Pete Kozma (10.8 UZR/150).”

    Isn’t a higher UZR number better? So are the Cardinals better at every position but SS?

    ConFoozed

    • http://www.facebook.com/lee.young.161 Lee Young

      btw…LOVED the article.

    • hildboldcf1

      probably has to do with McDonald dragging down the position with his below average defense, and to a smaller extent Jordy Mercer

    • http://www.piratesprospects.com Tim Williams

      If you look at all of the shortstops, the Cardinals are ranked ahead. That’s because John McDonald (and to a lesser extent, Jordy Mercer) have dragged down the total UZR at short for the Pirates.

      If you look at the two starters, the Pirates have the edge.

      • http://www.facebook.com/lee.young.161 Lee Young

        thx

  • clemo83

    Tim,

    Great anaylsis- one of your best articles. This system seems like a great way for a small market team to gain a sabremetric/moneyball type advantage. Maybe Neal does know what he’s doing…

    • http://www.facebook.com/matt.beam.16 Matt Beam

      couldn’t agree more with this post, best article of the year period and Neal does deserve more credit

  • http://www.facebook.com/adrian.carnelutti Adrian Carnelutti

    I agree a great article which does explain some of the teams success and might silence some of the Inge haters who might now see the value of the defensive utility infielder as the 24th man on the bench. Just one question, when Barmes contract expires next can you see Jordy Mercer being his defensive replacement or should we either offer him another year or go after another defensive shortstop like Brendan Ryan for a longer contract?

  • http://twitter.com/beatembuccos21 beatembuccos21

    Agree with the above posters – good stuff.

    It’d be interesting to see how Maholm and his ground all rate would perform had he remained a Buc.

  • Curtis

    Looking ahead, I believe both Cole and Taillon have 50%+ GB rates in their minor league careers. Defensively, Pedro seems to be continuing to improve, though a conversion from Barmes to Mercer or D’Arnaud would reduce the defense a bit in the long run.

    • leadoff

      “though a conversion from Barmes to Mercer or D’Arnaud would reduce the defense a bit in the long run.”
      _______________________________________________

      They would not reduce the defense enough that you would notice it, in fact in some area’s they might make it better.

      • emjayinTN

        Agree, Mercer and Walker looked pretty smooth together, and the kid has not folded under the pressure of his promotion. Every player getting to AA, AAA will get that one opportunity to prove themselves – some take full advantage and others, for a variety of reasons, do not prove themselves to be MLB caliber. Garrett Jones waited 4 or 5 years in AAA for his opp and it came after Pittsburgh selected him on waivers from the Twins. Great suicide squeeze by Mercer in a pressure packed moment last night – he just looks very comfortable.

  • https://profiles.google.com/110662152366084767261 Laura Day

    Moneyball Zoltan-style?

  • Kevin_Young

    I think a big underlying factor is defensive positioning. We do a very nice job of shifting a defense to player tendencies, and I’ve also noticed the Cubs do very well with this so you can see how it could lower BABIP. That facet of the game, in general, is only improving too.

    • http://www.facebook.com/tyler.sweeney.1610 Tyler Sweeney

      That’s a great point Kevin, it seems like the pirates have done a great job of shifting the infield around. I’d be interested to see how much it really has effected it

    • coloneldickweed

      Agree! The Pirates seem to be ahead of the curve from the rest of the league with their positioning. They don’t just shift for the obvious cleanup-hitting lefties. They’re doing it for every freaking player. You really notice it when watching us in person, with Leyva tweaking like a madman over in the dugout.

  • leadoff

    I have said all along, it is not about the numbers, it’s about the system, they keep pitchers down on the farm and people can not figure out why, maybe they want their pitchers improving their ground ball rates instead of worrying about walks or strikeouts, not that those are not important, they are very important. The sinker is the best pitch for ground balls, not the only one, the Pirates don’t like their young pitchers throwing sinkers, thus getting to the majors in the Pirate system is going to take time for any pitcher.
    All their pitchers are taught to pitch down in the zone, that can induce ground balls.
    Watching Locke and Gomez is a lot better than reading their stats, they both have no fear of going inside, they both keep the ball down and they use the high pitch occasionally to change eye level, their effective moving the ball around pitching comes from coaching, they have enough talent to execute this type of pitching, that is why their projected demise is premature.
    Every successful professional team in any sport that wins has a very good system, they all have systems, just not always good ones. Since systems are more important to me than individual numbers, I am glad that talk is evolving in that direction.
    Look at Irwin, Morris, ground ball pitchers, this is called pitching.

  • http://twitter.com/mjdouble mjdouble

    So what you are saying is Jordy Mercer doesn’t fit the system at shortstop.

  • http://www.facebook.com/jeremiah.ewing.9 Jeremiah Ewing

    As my colleagues say in the UK… Bloody brilliant mate!

    Best article of the year, and really eye opening… well done!

  • http://twitter.com/mocasdad mocasdad

    Good article, but even as a non-sabermetrician, I’m not in the least surprised by your findings. Ground balls + good infield defense have always been a good formula for limiting runs.

    Here’s a question – is there a reason the stats community focuses exclusively on averages, and never seems to look at medians and modes?

  • tempman89

    Tim, I’ve been on this website for close to 2 years. Your best work ever. Take some more weekends off if this is the work we can look forward to!!!

  • jg941

    Great article, Tim!

    One quibble is with the ranking of our infield defense. With position ranks of 18th, 13th, 16th and 8th (with, oddly, 3B ranked highest, not what most Bucs fans would have told you), that seems very much middle-of-the-pack ina 30-team league, as opposed to an elite defense.

    I would expect to see a couple Top 5 guys in there before I would consider it all tht impactful on BABIP, etc. Maybe I’m wrong – maybe some teams have a Top 5 defender at one position and the other three are ranked, like 25th in the league at their positions.

    Any idea how the ENTIRE Bucs infield ranks as a group in UZR as compared to the rest of the teams’ entire infields? Just curious – maybe a bunch of league-average position rankings makes them much higher as a whole.

    • Ecbucs

      good article but I do agree with jg941′s point. Other than Barmes the Bucs don’t have anyone else in the infield that could be considered above average defensively.

      So while the Bucs want a strong defense in the infield they don’t have one despite the numbers.

      A good thing about average BAIP is that somebody has to be above average and somebody below and it looks like the Bucs have pitchers that can be above average in this category.

  • leadoff

    After reading this article twice, I agree with some of it and disagree with some of it.
    As far as the Pirate system is concerned I agree.
    As far as plugging any ground ball pitcher into the system and the system will do the pitching, I could not disagree more.
    As far as Hughes not being suited for this system I disagree. he is a sinker ball pitcher, but the system can’t pitch for the pitcher, if you get the sinker ball up, it gets hit a long way and not on the ground. You must have good control to be a groundball pitcher. That is what Gomez and Locke have!
    I do agree that their infield is solid up the middle, but I would disagree that their infield is solid at the corners, Alvarez is capable of the great play, but lacks left side range, Jones is Jones, defense is not his thing and I am not impressed with Sanchez.
    I do not like the UZR stat, positioning is the key to defense, always was, always will be. The UZR stat does not show how many errors Barmes would have with the amount of bad throws he tosses to first base and the clutch errors he has.
    There are Shortstops in the hall of fame that had poor range, the Pirates won a World Series with Shortstops off the junk pile. Tim Foley could not make this team.
    “I will take the sure handed make all the plays he should make type of SS any day, a quote from Chuck Tanner”. I think Tanner would love Mercer.
    The trick for sabermetric geeks is to know when the numbers lie! The numbers are put together by humans that determine a strike, a ball, a hit, fair and foul and many other items. Baseball is a game that you have to watch to make proper determinations.
    Is their a stat for how many times an umpire has struck out a hitter instead of the pitcher?

    • Kevin_Young

      If you watch the game and seriously think Mercer’s defense is on the same level as Barmes’ that’s ridiculous…stats aside.

    • https://profiles.google.com/115522615427589477970 Mike C.

      you almost had me before “clutch errors”….

  • Ron Zorn

    Wow, great article. Consider myself a pretty educated fan, but never thought of baseball as having a clear cut “system”. Very interesting, another example as to why I read this site religiously.

  • jamminjoe66

    All these different stats doesn’t tell how many Barmas throws get dug out of the dirt. I agree it’s tough to watch Jones on D. But he has saved Barmas at least 10 – 15 extra errors this year. I still believe in the eye test.

    • http://www.piratesprospects.com Tim Williams

      Every first baseman has to dig throws out of the dirt. I don’t think that says anything about Barmes.

      • https://profiles.google.com/115522615427589477970 Mike C.

        Read someone from Fangraphs, (dave cameron i think…) mention a study was done about 1st basemen defense comparing the best “diggers” to the worst.
        throughout the course of a whole season, results were found to be negligible.

  • smurph

    Very good column, though a bit long, and good comments as well. I think the main thing here is the Pirates infield is above average defensively, but that is a huge improvement from what it was in 2011 or even last season. Also, let us not forget the huge difference at the catcher position. Opponents ran at will on the Pirates last season. I believe they were close to last in the majors in SBs against and SB % against. How many of us expected Martin to to be such an important piece to this team?